#
Company
Buy Side Availability
Digital Accessibility
Governance
Relevance
Supply Side Digitization
Score

331

IFOAM Organics International
1.0
1.0
4.0
1.0
1.0
1.6 / 5

332

Institute of Metrology, Standardization and Industrial Quality
1.0
1.0
4.0
1.0
1.0
1.6 / 5

333

INTERNATIONAL ANALOG FORESTRY NETWORK
1.0
1.0
4.0
1.0
1.0
1.6 / 5

334

INTERNATIONAL CARD MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION (ICMA)
1.0
1.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
1.6 / 5

335

INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES OF TUNIS (CITET)
1.0
1.0
4.0
1.0
1.0
1.6 / 5

336

IPM INSTITUTE OF NORTH AMERICA
1.0
1.0
4.0
1.0
1.0
1.6 / 5

337

IQ Net
1.0
1.0
2.0
1.0
3.0
1.6 / 5

338

Kenya Bureau Of Standards
1.0
1.0
4.0
1.0
1.0
1.6 / 5

339

KOREAN AGENCY FOR TECHNOLOGY AND STANDARDS (KATS)
1.0
1.0
4.0
1.0
1.0
1.6 / 5

340

Lao Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry
1.0
1.0
4.0
1.0
1.0
1.6 / 5

How We Rate Standard Owners

One of the biggest challenges in the sustainability industry is the need for more normalized data on sustainable procurement. Today, there are more standards that define sustainability than consumers can understand. At CommonShare we are launching the world’s most comprehensive system for the comparative evaluation of Standard Owners' to make it easier for brands and consumers to understand which standards are relevant and worth incorporating into their sustainable procurement plan. We are not interested in evaluating the sustainability characteristics, i.e., which Standard Owner represents sustainability better, but rather the weight they play in sustainable procurement and their governance implications.