#
Company
Buy Side Availability
Digital Accessibility
Governance
Relevance
Supply Side Digitization
Score

331

Institute of Metrology, Standardization and Industrial Quality
1.0
1.0
4.0
1.0
1.0
1.6 / 5

332

INTERNATIONAL ANALOG FORESTRY NETWORK
1.0
1.0
4.0
1.0
1.0
1.6 / 5

333

INTERNATIONAL CARD MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION (ICMA)
1.0
1.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
1.6 / 5

334

INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES OF TUNIS (CITET)
1.0
1.0
4.0
1.0
1.0
1.6 / 5

335

IPM INSTITUTE OF NORTH AMERICA
1.0
1.0
4.0
1.0
1.0
1.6 / 5

336

IQ Net
1.0
1.0
2.0
1.0
3.0
1.6 / 5

337

Kenya Bureau Of Standards
1.0
1.0
4.0
1.0
1.0
1.6 / 5

338

KOREAN AGENCY FOR TECHNOLOGY AND STANDARDS (KATS)
1.0
1.0
4.0
1.0
1.0
1.6 / 5

339

Lao Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry
1.0
1.0
4.0
1.0
1.0
1.6 / 5

340

Loreus
1.0
1.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
1.6 / 5

How We Rate Standard Owners

One of the biggest challenges in the sustainability industry is the need for more normalized data on sustainable procurement. Today, there are more standards that define sustainability than consumers can understand. At CommonShare we are launching the world’s most comprehensive system for the comparative evaluation of Standard Owners' to make it easier for brands and consumers to understand which standards are relevant and worth incorporating into their sustainable procurement plan. We are not interested in evaluating the sustainability characteristics, i.e., which Standard Owner represents sustainability better, but rather the weight they play in sustainable procurement and their governance implications.